 |
|
|
|
 |
| |
| Geometrical
constructions can be made with the aid of a straight edge and a pair of
compasses. The compasses is obviously being used for making circles. In
order to do this you must put the needle of the compasses in the paper.
The places where you put the needle in the paper you could call ‘construction
points’. |
|
|
| |
|
While reconstructing the
different crop circles I noticed that these construction points were
always on special places. They were all on spots where the crop was
downed in the actual crop formation or in a tramline. At first this gave
me some shock because you can replace the needle of the compasses by a
person holding a rope. My first thought was: it were humans after all!
Then I quickly realized that my own findings make it impossible that it
were humans. Think of the different elements that are necessary to
construct a formation but which can not be found back in the final
design. This is impossible for humans to perform in a field. But
nevertheless, I could not find a construction point that was placed in
‘standing crop’.
In the diagrams are some
examples shown of reconstructed crop formations. The used construction
points are marked as little circles. See also the main-section
Crop Circle Reconstructions.
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Barbury
Castle, 1992
The
1992 Barbury Castle formation is another example. Here we see a
different situation. One of the used construction points lies far away
from the actual formation. But again it is NOT in standing crop. The
mentioned construction point lies exactly on a spot where a tramline was
running! |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| What
does this all mean? By just looking at the used construction points, one
can easily come to the conclusion that all the studied formations were
made by humans. But by looking at the overall reconstructions one must
admit that humans cannot have made these formations in the way I
reconstructed them on paper! |
|
|
| |
Etchilhampton,
1997
I
will now show you the reconstruction of a formation where again no
construction points could be found in 'standing crop'. Though with this
formation it goes a little further. The formation contained an element
that was strictly necessary just to avoid the situation of having
construction points in standing crop! I will not show all the
construction steps but just the crucial ones.
The diagrams show the steps where first the size
of a necessary circle is determined which consequently is putted into
place.
See also
Etchilhampton - England 1997
in the main-section Crop Circle Reconstructions for all the steps. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| The
circle constructed in the diagrams above is used to determine the
position of six new circles. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
The
diagram on the right shows the finished reconstruction with the used
construction points indicated as small circles.
Notice that six of those construction points were situated on the ring
round the formation. If this ring had not been there, those six points
would have been in standing crop. Furthermore if the ring had been
bigger or smaller, again the six points would have been in standing
crop! Remarkably enough we see that firstly the ring is there and
secondly the ring has exactly the 'correct' size. The ring had to
be there! The construction point in the center of the formation was situated just on the edge of a
tramline. |
|
|
|
| |
| With
regard to construction points we can come to the following conclusions: |
|
|
| |
-
The necessary construction points could in
the studied formations never been found in standing crop;
- Some formations have elements that are strictly
necessary to avoid construction points in standing crop.
Let
me once more point out that though the construction points indicate that
humans could have made the studied formations, the overall constructions
are making this impossible! For the construction necessary elements
cannot be found back in the final design. You cannot make downed crop
stand again. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
